The once targeted avoidance of the internet of a single controlling entity did not help in a small part. This approach made its rapid and widespread acceptance possible because internet operation did not need networks to grant control or permission to another entity, so that they met various requirements and the World Wide Web if an audience was positioned properly. It also reflected the efforts to prevent a single technical malfunction from having a disproportionate impact.
Centralization became a fact with Web 2.0 and the avoidance of it has proven to be difficult since then. Many online applications and protocols work in a centralized way. However, centralization takes contrary to the nature of the internet. It is often described as a “network of networks” because it is a huge and heterogeneous collection of interconnected systems. These networks agree to facilitate communication instead of being subordinate to the requirements of others.
The emphasis on action independence is reflected in network design and architecture, such as the concept of an autonomous system. Blockchain technology has made possible decentralized networks consisting of nodes that receive, store and ship data. There is no centralized server and therefore no failure point. If a junction drops, the network can continue to work.
Network power is proportional to the number of participants
A distributed network ensures that data depends on multiple sources, which none of them manages centrally. Everyone can participate and contribute to such networks. The more nodes there are in a network, the more powerful it often becomes. The technology shows a considerable promise to achieve decentralization. Datagram, a platform for powerful applications that make fast and scalable connectivity possible, has launched its alpha test network, so that users can operate and validate a verifiable coordination layer for the interoperability of decentralized physical infrastructure networks or depins. With the test network, participants can serve nodes, earn rewards for references and uptime and improve network performance.
The infrastructure of Datagram means that the worries about internet centralization and vulnerability on the internet tackle. Many services rely on non-transparent networks, own clouds, APIs controlled by suppliers, etc. Datagram makes it possible to host workloads, to randate, validate and score about fragmented Depin networks with proof-based coordination. The test network focuses on measurable contribution, transparency and minimal dependence on central mediators to support the verifiable infrastructure layer.
Everyone can serve a data junction, even without blockchain expertise. Participants install nodes that automatically check the availability four times a day and report the status. They earn AirDrop points for every successful check-in, which convert into $ dgram tokens during the TGE that takes place in the third quarter of 2025. Top contributors are eligible for extra hardware reward.
Decentralization focuses on scarcity and encourages competition
If there were only one supplier of a service or function in a jurisdiction or region, that function or service there would be centralized for the users there, one would accept. However, it is now possible to decentralize a service that is only available through a limited number of providers or even only one. Depins enable individuals and small operators to contribute hardware sources, such as computing, storage, wireless connectivity or sensors. They divide the physical layer of the internet over a wide network of participants.
Token incentives, modular architecture and reputation systems can coordinate and scales reliable contributions from a diverse pool of operators if the function specialized equipment or expertise requires. You can decentralize services that were once impeded by high costs or limited access, reducing a few points of failure and improving the resilience and openness of infrastructure.
Internet users benefit from robust competition, especially when they can develop their own applications and services according to interoperable standards. When services or functions become dependent on a centralized platform because there are no substitutes, they become essential facilities, inevitable, which leads to abuse of power. Internet applications and services improve when there are several ways to gain access to them. Centralized services can benefit from the attention needed due to their increased role, but if they fail, the impact of losing availability can be disproportionate.
By accessing information from a centralized service, it can improve its offer, but the service refuses others such access. Detecting data storage of the services will restore users’ control over their data, according to Sir Timothy John Berners-Lee, who invented the internet. This means that people can use all the services they want and also store their data wherever they want.
The internet has deviated from its conceptual origin: Google Search, Amazon Web Services and the social networks of Meta are all relevant examples. Decentralization plans to break that monopoly. Distributed networks can guarantee that no entity controls the information flow, in contrast to a single server that hosts all data.
The obstacle-striking road to trustless infrastructure
Network effects that cause centralization can also provide benefits, such as improvements in latency, resilience and efficiency. The optimum degree of decentralization for a function varies depending on specific circumstances. One can reduce the risks related to a necessary centralized function by delegating their implementation to several stakeholders, which facilitates well -considered and broadly agreed decisions. Blockchains Distribute mediation and other potentially centralized tasks into members of a huge pool of protocol participants. A transaction manager or another cryptographic technique usually guarantees the correct performance of a function.
One of the shortcomings of distributed consensus protocols is the diffuse responsibility for an operation between different parties that can be difficult to identify. This can effectively prevent some types of centralization, but it also becomes impossible to keep someone responsible for the performance of a function. Services in decentralized ecosystems can include SDKs from third parties, privileged operations and other centralized elements or scenarios, which are contrary to the principle of decentralization and can lead to security risks.
The risks of persistent centralization should not be traced in any way. They include but are not limited to random changes by authorities, fakes, security vulnerabilities, accounts and human errors with disastrous consequences. The shift to a decentralized internet is intended to create a more transparent, private and safe online experience for all users.
Credit : cryptonews.net
