Anyone who doubts that Democrats have not learned anything from the presidential elections of November, does not have to look beyond the calls for the expulsion of Mayor Eric Adams.
Democrats accuse him of being President Donald Trump’s ‘hostage’ because he offers to do what the Prez wants – ie help him to deport violent illegal migrants – reportedly in exchange for the driving criminal charges of the Ministry of Justice against him.
Four deputy mayors stopped on Monday about the problem.
The truth? Adams is doing the people shall.
Regardless of what it looks like. Regardless of the enormous heat he takes from open, pro-criminal radicals.
For this, Hizzoner – for all his other mistakes – deserves a healthy praise.
And if DEMS cannot recover from their long-term Trump Derangement Syndrome and the majority of voters as awarded, their Downslide (yes, even in Bluer-Dan-Blauw New York) will remain without prejudice.
Here is the last about mayor Eric Adams
Do they really want to stay in the wilderness forever?
According to the rules of #resistence, anyone who does not succeed complete Suppose Team Trump should not exercise power in New York.
It doesn’t matter how much good he will do. It doesn’t matter how much the public supports his policy.
So yes, both Trump and Adams want violent criminal migrants. But that also applies to 80% of New Yorkers, according to a recent Siena survey.
They even support Trump’s generally Deportation efforts with an impressive margin of 48% -31%.
Democrats easily ignore these voters and claim that Adams only does what they want because of the “lever” that Trump has about him.
That is because Justice’s decision to drop the indictment enables them to be displayed again later.
(Remember that those four deputy mayors had no problem staying on board, although Adams were accused of bribery and campaign funding violations.)
But even if there wax A “Quid Pro quo” (although that is anything but clear), why would the voters mind that Adams do exactly what they want, regardless of his motivation?
Remember that Adams was largely chosen on the basis of his promise to lower crime.
He spoke about determining laws in the field of sanctuary and the collection of migrant criminals long before the righteousness thought to drop those charges.
And moreover, what options had justice?
If public prosecutors were to drop the charges without the possibility that they could be recaptured again, critics would have cried even louder.
Nor would it have served the public if the charges remained and Adams were pulled in court. In that case, how would he have done the bidding of people?
Dems just don’t care what people actually want to. They are hijacked by left -wing extremists without contact with normal voters and have put their ideologies above the interests of everyday New Yorkers.
The instincts of Adams, on the other hand, Craque on Crime, Fix the Rample Criminal-Justice Reforms, Catch and deported violent illegal migrant criminals, get help for the spiritual-sick-nettes match the opinion of the voters.
Although in fact are a liberal, his common sense visions and beliefs are the future of the Democratic party, if there is one.
Of course, you can criticize him because he has not made sufficient progress, say, reducing crime.
But where he has failed, it is generally the fault of progressive legislators in Albany who bind his hands.
Now the heat is on GOV. Kathy Hochul to expel him if he refuses to resign.
She, and those who push her to remove him from his office should know voters Such as the approach of Adams.
If they run the city properly chosen leader (to do .. . What, Exactly?), They will eventually pay a steep price at the polls.
We hope that the day will come soon when the DEMS act acts for the common majority and puts New Yorkers first, not their internal party politics.
